Baby Chakraborty, KalimNews, September 27, 2024, Calcutta: The state government is once again under the spotlight as the Calcutta High Court raises questions about a notification issued by the Kolkata Police. The notification, released by Lalbazar (the Kolkata Police headquarters), places restrictions on gatherings in a large section of central Kolkata, sparking controversy and legal challenges.
The notice, which prohibits the assembly of more than five people in certain key areas of the city, has become a focal point of legal debate. The restricted zones include Boubazar, Hare Street, Traffic Guard, and the Headquarters area—all centered around the bustling Dharmatala region. According to the notification, these restrictions are set to be in place from September 25 to November 23, 2024, a period that overlaps with several major festivals, including Durga Puja.
The state government faced tough questions during a hearing on Friday, presided over by Justice Rajshree Bharadwaj of the Calcutta High Court. The central issue revolved around whether the state would reconsider or withdraw the police notification, especially given the upcoming festive season, which typically draws large crowds. Justice Bharadwaj pointedly asked, “Is there any reason to withdraw this notification, or will all pujas in the area have to be stopped?”
The timing of the notification, issued just days before the start of Durga Puja preparations, has raised several concerns, particularly among community organizers. The restriction on gatherings has been seen by some as an attempt to curb potential protests during the festive period, sparking confusion and speculation about the motive behind the move.
The state’s counsel responded to the court, noting that such restrictions, including the enforcement of Section 163, have historically been in place in areas like KC Das to Victoria House, even in past years. However, the state also acknowledged that this year’s notification has introduced an extended enforcement area, including the Bentinck Street area, which has led to some confusion.
Advocate Vikas Ranjan Bhattacharya, representing the petitioners, raised concerns about the impact of the police directive on the numerous pujas and community celebrations held within the restricted zones. The court sought clarification from the state on how these restrictions would affect the festive proceedings in police stations where major pujas are organized.
The notification has drawn criticism for potentially disrupting the city’s biggest cultural and religious events, and many argue that the timing of its enforcement is poorly planned. Several civic groups and political commentators have questioned whether the move is aimed at stifling political protests rather than addressing public safety, adding a layer of complexity to the legal proceedings.
As tensions rise over the notification, the Calcutta High Court has scheduled another hearing on the matter for next Monday, where further arguments will be presented. The outcome of this case could have significant implications not only for the state government but also for the city’s cultural landscape during one of the most important festival seasons of the year.