Baby Chakraborty, KalimNews, March 30, 2025, Kolkata :  The ongoing political tension and debates surrounding law and order in West Bengal, particularly concerning Ram Navami celebrations, have reached a critical juncture. Municipal Minister Firhad Hakim recently warned that a small group of individuals from other states could incite unrest in the state on Ram Navami. However, he expressed confidence that if such individuals are identified early, there would be no issue. Firhad emphasized that both he and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee remain vigilant during the festival, staying up at night each year to ensure the peace is maintained.

In the meantime, opposition figures, including Leader of the Opposition Shuvendu Adhikari and BJP leader Dilip Ghosh, have adopted a sharp tone as Ram Navami approaches. Both leaders have issued stern warnings against the participation of armed processions and public gatherings during the festivities. Through their remarks, the BJP appears to be leveraging the occasion to strengthen its political narrative, rallying support around the principles of Hindutva as it prepares for the upcoming elections in the state. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), in alignment with BJP’s agenda, has instructed its workers to bolster the show of force during the Ram Navami processions.

Responding to the rising political and religious tensions, Firhad Hakim stood firm in his belief that “communal politics will not work in Bengal,” emphasizing that the state remains committed to the secular values espoused by figures like Ramakrishna. Hakim also criticized Union Minister Amit Shah’s attempts to cultivate support for the BJP in the state, saying that religious politics would not succeed in West Bengal.

Meanwhile, the RSS has refrained from directly intervening in the law and order matters surrounding the Ram Navami celebrations, deferring to the police administration. Dr. Jishnu Basu, the RSS’s Eastern Field Co-Promotion Officer, expressed the organization’s acceptance of the police’s decision on how to handle the procession, highlighting that different regions have diverse religious practices, and the law and order situation must be managed by the local authorities.

As tensions rise, West Bengal’s political landscape becomes increasingly polarized, with both major parties vying for influence. The key challenge moving forward will be maintaining peace and communal harmony as political factions continue to assert their positions in the lead-up to the next elections.

Baby Chakraborty, KalimNews, March 26, 2025, Kolkata: As the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections approach, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has intensified its campaign, adopting a strong Hindutva narrative. The party has set its sights on securing a decisive mandate and has mobilized its cadre across the state. Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari has termed the upcoming elections as a defining battle, referring to it as a ‘religious war’ aimed at protecting Hinduism. His statement has sparked widespread discussions and reactions, with both support and criticism pouring in from various quarters.

Adhikari has openly positioned the elections as a fight to safeguard religious and cultural values. His stance has garnered strong backing from the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which has been actively involved in organizational groundwork in Bengal. The RSS-affiliated publication ‘Swastika’ has endorsed Adhikari’s call, describing it as a timely movement and urging supporters to extend their wisdom, guidance, and assistance. The publication has emphasized that Adhikari’s leadership is crucial in countering ideological opposition and fostering unity among like-minded groups.

The BJP leadership is confident that the 2026 elections will yield a favorable outcome. The party has launched an aggressive campaign across the state, with leaders actively engaging in public outreach programs. A significant boost to the party’s campaign came with the recent visit of RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat to Bengal. During his visit, he conducted multiple high-level meetings, reinforcing the BJP’s strategy and infusing fresh energy into its ranks. Political analysts have noted that the BJP’s Bengal unit has received renewed momentum from these developments, which have strengthened its organizational structure and ideological positioning.

In line with its electoral strategy, the BJP has launched a poster campaign across the state, prominently displaying slogans emphasizing Hindu unity and the need for a BJP-led government in 2026. The posters, carrying the message ‘Hindu Hindu Bhai Bhai, 2026 e BJP Chai’ (Hindus are brothers; we want BJP in 2026), have drawn considerable attention and sparked debates. The campaign underscores the party’s commitment to consolidating the Hindu vote bank and challenging the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) on issues of governance and policy.

Meanwhile, BJP legislators have intensified their criticism of the TMC’s policies, particularly targeting what they term as ‘appeasement politics.’ The opposition has been vocal in its accusations, arguing that the current administration has neglected the interests of the majority community. These statements have fueled further political discourse, with leaders from both parties engaging in sharp exchanges.

The TMC, on its part, has countered the BJP’s campaign by reaffirming its commitment to inclusive governance. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has dismissed the BJP’s narrative, asserting that democracy in West Bengal stands for harmony and coexistence. She has accused the opposition of attempting to polarize the electorate along religious lines for electoral gains. TMC leaders have actively campaigned against what they describe as ‘divisive politics,’ urging voters to reject efforts aimed at disturbing social unity.

As the election season progresses, the political climate in Bengal is becoming increasingly charged. The BJP’s focus on Hindutva, combined with the RSS’s active involvement, has set the stage for a high-stakes contest. The ruling TMC remains steadfast in its approach, countering the BJP’s assertions with its governance record and welfare initiatives. The coming months are expected to witness heightened political activity, with both parties vying for public support in a fiercely contested electoral battle.

Baby Chakraborty, KalimNews, Kolkata, March 24, 2025: A controversy has erupted in Kolkata after a picture of Chapra Police Station’s IC, Anindya Mukherjee, sitting on a Trinamool political stage while wearing a turban adorned with the Trinamool Congress symbol went viral on social media. The incident, which has raised eyebrows, occurred in the Chapra police station area of Nadia, where the Trinamool Congress had been organizing various programs, including Ramadan-related events and clothing donation drives.

For several days, these programs have been actively supported and promoted by the local Trinamool Congress. On one such occasion, Anindya Mukherjee, the police station IC, was invited to attend a community Iftar gathering organized by the Trinamool Minority Cell. The image, showing Mukherjee wearing the turban with the Trinamool party symbol prominently displayed around his neck, quickly spread online, triggering intense political debate.

In response to the controversy, Trinamool Uttar Organizational District Spokesperson, Debashish Roy, defended the event, stating that such programs are intended to honor notable community figures. He argued that it was not unusual for police officers or other dignitaries to be invited to such events. Roy also downplayed the significance of the Trinamool symbol, stating that he could not confirm whether the symbol was indeed visible on the turban, and criticized the BJP for focusing on the issue instead of addressing the lack of developmental work in their own areas.

On the other hand, BJP leader Somnath Kar sharply criticized Mukherjee’s participation, asserting that the picture clearly depicted a police official aligning with the Trinamool party. He questioned how an administrative official could attend a party function and wear a symbol of a political party, raising concerns about the potential implications for legal actions if individuals present at the event had committed criminal acts.

The situation has prompted a wider discussion on the role of public officials in political events and the potential implications for the neutrality expected of government employees. As the debate continues to unfold, the local police and political parties remain at the center of this controversy.